Tuesday, January 19, 2010

3 idiot: An idiotic justification of incompetency

Talking about, the most successful film, referring to revenue collection in the history of bollywood and controversial over idea theft, movie ‘3 Idiots’, is quite tough. Even Taran Adarsh and other critics of cinema have revealed their surprise about the success of ‘3 Idiots’. Undoubtedly, such kinds of responses from the critical side of the movie convey its normality and nothing else. I mean that Amir Khan’s ‘3 idiot’ is not extra-ordinary movie to think over it. But the Box-office collection of the movie compels to talk and engross our selves to find out the reason behind the success of the movie.

Rather reliability of critics can be questioned and my dependency on them as well, but none can deny the fact that this movie is far behind from Aamir’s other movies like ‘Rang De Basanti’, ‘Tare Jamin Par’ and all.

‘3 idiots’ is based on Chetan Bhagat’s novel ‘Five Point Someone’ in which the relevancy of education system of the country has been criticized on basis of producing rattu-mulls. Though, it’s being denied by creative team of the movie. Whatever it is not the matter of discussion here. Our focus of concern would be to find out why this movie is that much hit (revenue collection, farce criteria to check a movie).

The question is which kind of criteria should be followed in schools and colleges so that rattu-mulls should be stopped from coming in scene or to push anti- rattu team one-step ahead so that our education system can be justified. I think this is the lack of competency of anti- rattu team which is demanding reservation for pushing them on apex with their incompetency. I am not supporting the on-going education system in the country because lacunae in Maikale’s gift to India are well identified and there is need to work over it.

But I think those who-ever are managing themselves according to present education system are not joker rather more competent and flexible to adjust anywhere. And they are proving it while working in the field. May be they are working with private-organizations and instead of the proper utilization of their talent they are forced to work as money making machines. That’s different thing but their flexibility and competency can’t be denied.

Simultaneously, people who are unable to fold themselves according to the available system can’t be justified after raising fingers on system. And who can predict that these incompetent people could adjust in different education system in a better manner. It’s a matter of rationalize thinking and honest as well after rejecting personal instinct of justifying.

The second thought related to issue is how far film-makers are from the problem of the mass. In the movie, students have denied adopting the present curriculum of study in the leading of Rancho (Aamir Khan) in the movie. It’s good to go for personal interest because to do justice with self. Undoubtedly anyone can perform better with his/her first choice compared to a second one. And even monetarily failed with the favorite periphery of self could be justified in this zone of discussion.

In the movie, Rancho, the leader of this campaign rejects the system impressively and disappears from the scene. When he is being searched by his friends accompanied by his girl friend too...Their would be common expectation from the viewer’ side that Rancho wouldn’t lost the struggle even after going to verge of destroy financially. This is the state where viewers could relate themselves from him because all denials of system are not able to transform it in success rather percentage of such success is incredibly less. But he appears as a scientist in the climax of movie with very film end.

Few facts are also available which discredit the movie worth such gain, what ever it has got, like the repetition of his feeble emotions. We can consider here the usages of orphans and orphanage in ‘3 idiots’ after its use in ‘Tare Jamin Par’. What does he try to show handicaps children with him not in normal look but with their disturbing look? It’s shameful for the so called perfectionist, innovator and intellectual of our own bollywood. Aamir’ effort to sensitize viewers in this manner shows his command over the on-going problems of mass now days….rather we can discuss it later why it is ethically wrong.

So, after such kind of lacunas, why movie has got that much success at the box-office! Notably there is not anything special (outstanding) in the movie referring to music, comedy and other aspects which contribute in the success of any movie. We can go through two dimensions to catch the bird which has made it excellent and worth earning over Rs 350 crore.

One is the marketing in newly emerged mall culture with providing maximum possible print at the date of release and the second is youths who have found themselves failure in this education system but perceiving it wrongly using hard-workers and flexible personalities as scapegoat to express their anger.

7 comments:

  1. This is the first criticism of 3 idiots, where writer is not effected by filthy measures like gross income of film, aura of Mr, Perfectionist and glorification of failure. ‘Maikale’s gift’ is a good phrase to coin.

    Welcome to blog world. Keep updating.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In the Defence of Creativity!

    21 JAN 2010


    Though i don’t claim to be a highly conversant fellow in cinema and literature but i am an average intelligent common man with some flare for creativity, and i trust myself.

    The moment i finished watching “3-idiots” i was totally entertained by the movie. My reaction was partially influenced by the Lateral Thinking, John Holt & Multiple Intelligence Theory books which i am reading from past two months.

    I must confess that you should rate the movie after coming out of the after-effect whether it is good or bad. I also don’t rely on the box office business because we cannot compare movies by the money they generate if we are talking about the art of cinema and value of the content. But i am not totally agreed with your views on the movie. I also found some lacunae in the movie but it is not so much as you mentioned. The reason it is huge hit lies somewhere in the areas what you mentioned but that is not all. It has a content which appeals and it has been presented like this for the first time. Some lecture type scenes and super dramas could have been avoided but the team of 3 idiots deserves appreciation. The message was clear and it was meant more for the mass, less for the critics (who are sometimes so honest to their job that they criticize just for the sake of it). And it did the job well. I don’t favor the movies that are richer in content & so complicated that the so called well informed intellectual viewer appreciates and the common man cannot dare to understand & express. Those classics have their place and i respect them but we need movies for the common man also.

    Here i must clear that i also feel that 3-idiots could have been much better and there is always a great possibility of embedding a good message in a simple manner loved by all. But it doesn’t mean that we should condemn such a brilliant effort like this. I consider it as a sequel of TZP which was targeting school education and now 3 idiots has questioned our traditional approach to career choice & college education. And a simple middle class man can enjoy getting the tough message, it is enough.

    Our educational system has to revive itself and focus on the Multiple Intelligences with unique character traits so that we can produce professionals who love their jobs not because they get money but because that is what they are meant to do. I don’t think it is an achievement that we are producing individuals who can adjust everywhere, in fact this is a tragedy for any young man who has to adjust & compromise with his talent. Call it Conditioning or Strategic Motivation, this is what happening from a long time and it should cease now. We had no choice but it doesn’t mean that we justify it by the jugglery of words; rather we should try to make a better pool of choices for the coming generation.

    But I must appreciate you Dear Kundan that you can penetrate so deeply into this subject, the direction is a matter of disagreement but the effort is very impressive. But never forget that somebody said, “IF YOU DON'T THINK LIKE ME, THEN YOU ARE WRONG”.

    I am still wondering !!!

    Who knows !?!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nice blog Kundan
    Keep it up
    As far as your post is concerned I must say that my first reaction after finishing the movie was 'just good' and I think so yet.
    The movie is good in its presentation and should be appreciated at least in the wake of today's bollywood scenario where you can get moveis you can say good just one or two in year.
    I'd also like to add that this is the weakest creation of Hirani too and he is also coming down a step back with his every film after Munnabhai MBBS just like several directors of our time like Madhur Bhandarkar, Priyadarshan and many more...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear,
    thr are many more flaws in the movie which can generate a healthy debate abt it.
    1.The makers of movie with such stong message (so called) even cant give ude respect to the writer of basic plot (thr words.
    2. Mr perfectionists humour is crosing the limits of humour ta times.
    3. wht kind of msg they wanna deliver wid comic presentation of chatur ramalingam? dnt you think it is racial?
    4. With whome the youth shd identify themselves in movie? Rancho,Raju or sahastrabuddha?
    well really nice to see u in blog world kundan keep writing.....

    ReplyDelete
  5. The comment on this movie is very correct.the depth of thinking is what should be learnt from the author of this blog.i was feeling a bit dyslexic while reading the post.
    starting with the title of this movie,3 idiots.it does not suit the movie.rather the name of the movie should have been 2 idiots becoz rancho is shown as the genius in the whole movie.NOT EVEN a single moment in the film u will find him as an idiot.now the focus is music which author had described as "not special".i wud like to say something abt the lyricist of this movie "SWANAND KIRKIRE".did he ran from madhya pradesh just to write these crap song like "are chachu aaaaall is well".


    in the end i agree with the author scapegoat instance and i think "NOTHING IS WELL" in this movie

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's really a nice article and points out towards one probability,why the traditional system of education is being rejected but its just a probabillity, the artcile seems to prejudiced and nothing wrong in it but at least before calling some one "incompetent people" it should be noted that in the book, from where it is said to be inspired the characters took admission to IIT delhi throug IIT entrance which is not a easy nut to crack, as well as in the movie the college where students have taken admission is depicted as one of the most prestigious institute where they came after facing tough competition, i.e, the guys could not be called incompetent on the basis of their revolution against the old Maikale’s system.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 3 idiotis nice movies, i like it very much

    ReplyDelete